Did Peter return to Jerusalem right after meeting
Cornelius?
If he had done that, the news wouldn't have beaten him to Jerusalem. Peter
stayed with Cornelius in Caesarea "a few days"
(Acts 10:48, see
Lord of All) as they asked him to.
Who were "those of the circumcision" (Acts 11:3)?
The Jewish Christians - "brethren" (Acts 11:1) -
and may have included one or more of the other
"apostles" (Acts 11:1) in Jerusalem.
How happy were they to hear "that the gentiles had also
received the word of God" (Acts 11:1)?
They weren't. Their statement, "You went in to
uncircumcised men and ate with them!” (Acts 11:3) wasn't a questions
but an accusation aimed at Peter, with whom they "contended"
(Acts 11:2).
What did Acts 8:1 & 4 say about persecution and the spread of the Gospel?
"... At that time a great persecution arose against the
church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered throughout the
regions of Judea and Samaria, except the apostles... Therefore those who
were scattered went everywhere preaching the word."
Then why was hearing "that the gentiles had also received the word of God"
(Acts 11:1) even news to them?
"Those who were scattered went everywhere preaching the
word" (Acts 8:4) but they had gone "preaching the
word to no one but the Jews only" (Acts 11:19 below); until now, they
had skipped over all of the gentiles.
Why would they do, that and why weren't they happy to hear that the
gentiles also had received the word of God?
Jewish Christians still held to the long-entrenched Jewish belief that
gentiles were unclean (see
Fear of God).
(Peter is recounting what happened as recorded and discussed in Acts 10.)
Had God taken Peter to Cornelius to teach Cornelius?
Peter did teach Cornelius, but if teaching had been the main objective, the Lord probably would have waited until Peter had finished
teaching to fall upon them. And instead of bringing Peter all the way from Jerusalem, He
could
have used Philip (see
Samaria), who was already living in
"Caesarea" (Acts 8:40 & 21:8) and therefore could teach him for more than just
“a few days” (Acts 10:48).
Then had God taken Peter to Cornelius to have Peter
guide the Holy Spirit falling on Cornelius' household?
Again, had that been the case, the Holy Spirit would have fallen on them
on Peter's cue. Instead, "the Holy Spirit fell
upon them" (Acts 11:15) as Peter was just getting into his
message (see Acts 11:15).
Then, to do what had God taken Peter to Cornelius?
Not because God needed Peter to do something to
help Him but for Peter to watch God in action, and for what he witnessed to
overcome Peter's prejudice, as well as those of the other Jewish Christians.
What lent credibility to Peter's testimony to those
in Jerusalem?
It was backed by the "six brethren" (Acts 11:12)
- Jewish Christians - who had accompanied Peter "from
Joppa" (Acts 10:23) to Cornelius' house.
What is remarkable about the conclusion of those who
heard Peter?
God spent days preparing Peter, having him lodge with someone who works with unclean, dead animals,
showing him visions, and talking to him. God let the six Jewish Christians
to at least witness the Holy Spirit falling upon Cornelius' household. But God
turned the hearts of the Jewish Christians in Jerusalem so quickly that they
went from 'contending' (Acts 11:2) with Peter for associating with gentiles one moment to
glorifying God for it the next. Prejudices deeply-ingrained over many
centuries had been neutralized during a single conversation about the love of God being poured out on the lost.