Who are recorded as being happy that the blind man
received sight?
Neither the people who brought him nor the Pharisees who received him.
How do they treat him?
Like an accomplice to a crime.
What is the crime?
Jesus mixed His saliva with dirt on the Sabbath. Jesus applied the
mixture to the blind man's eyes on the Sabbath. Jesus healed on the
Sabbath. They considered all three actions to be “work” and therefore
illegal on the Sabbath.
Were they right?
No, for two reasons. First, doing good on the Sabbath was lawful:
“What man is there among you
who has one sheep, and if it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will not
lay hold of it and lift it out? How much more valuable then is a man
than a sheep? Therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath”
(Matthew 12:11-12). Second, Jesus is the “Lord of
the Sabbath,” not vice versa: “The Sabbath
was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. Therefore the Son of Man
is Lord also of the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27-28).
Why was there “a division among” the “Pharisees”
(John 9:16)?
The Pharisees had made up a dizzying number of laws to try to discern what was and wasn't
of God (see
Pharisees). The healing of a man born blind was a powerful
“sign” (John 9:16) that it was of God, but it
had taken place on a Sabbath, which their man-made laws dictated wasn't of
God. Some of the Pharisees voiced this conflict, while others tried to resolve
it by siding with
their man-made laws and deciding that Jesus “is not from
God, because He does not keep the Sabbath” (John 9:16).