Why did Paul suddenly shout that he was "a Pharisee, the
son of a Pharisee" (Acts 23:6)?
He actually was a Pharisee and the son of a Pharisee. (Note that Christians
could be
Pharisees since Pharisees believe in resurrection, but Christians couldn't be
Sadducees,
"for
Sadducees say that there is no resurrection"
(Acts 23:8) including the resurrection of Jesus.) Also, the command to inflict
harm on Paul's mouth, if still 'live,' had to be smothered so that
his
mouth could continue to be used to testify about Jesus. Seeing "that one part were
Sadducees and the other
Pharisees"
(Acts 23:6), Paul decided to pit them against one another so that a
"dissension arose between the Pharisees and the
Sadducees" (Acts 23:7) and "the scribes of the Pharisees’ party
arose and protested, saying, "We find no evil in this man; but if a spirit
or an angel has spoken to him, let us not fight against God" (Acts 23:9).
For what "hope and resurrection of the dead" (Acts 23:6)
was Paul being judged (by the Sadducees)?
The
resurrection of Christ, which proved His deity and the fact that He died
to save us from our sins as He claimed before His death:
"But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then
Christ is not risen. And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty
and your faith is also empty. Yes, and we are found false witnesses of God,
because we have testified of God that He raised up Christ, whom He did not
raise up - if in fact the dead do not rise. For if the dead do not rise, then
Christ is not risen. And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you
are still in your sins!" (1 Corinthians 15:13-17)
To what "spirit or an angel" (Acts 23:9) speaking to
Paul were the Pharisees referring?
They were recounting in their own words Paul's testimony about meeting Jesus
on the road to Damascus (see
Saul, Saul, Why are you persecuting Me?).
Shouldn't Paul first have given his personal testimony to the council?
The Pharisees' words above, as well as their intended audience indicate that
they already had heard Paul's testimony the previous day or at least heard
about it. And the remainder of Paul's stay in Judea would provide them plenty of
time to go and ask him questions about his testimony if they wanted.
Why did the Roman commander order his soldiers to
retrieve Paul by force?
For a Roman commander to "fear..." (Acts 23:10)
that Paul might be "pulled to pieces"
(Acts 23:10), the
"dissension" (Acts 23:10) between the Pharisees and
Sadducees must have been indeed
"great" (Acts 23:10).