Was Peter telling a crowd of disciples about the
resurrection of Jesus?
No, it was a crowd that had gathered after hearing a strange sound
and then people speaking in languages that they (the speakers) had never learned
(see
Acts 2:7-8).
Were they hearing pleasant things from Peter?
He was accusing them of murdering - "you
have taken by lawless hands, have crucified, and put to death" (Acts
2:23) - God.
So why did they keep quiet instead of objecting to what
Peter was saying about Jesus' resurrection?
They couldn't deny the truth of what he was saying. Jesus' body had
disappeared from a guarded tomb (photos) and over
five hundred people were running around the region
testifying that they had seen the resurrected Jesus: "After that He
was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part
remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep" (1 Corinthians
15:6). Think about this for a second. Had there been any doubt about Jesus'
resurrection, Peter would have been challenged, if not shouted
down, by this crowd, who would have dispersed, dismissing Jesus as just a
rabbi who had done and said some amazing things but eventually talked too
much and gotten himself killed. But if Jesus is someone who is more powerful
than death and not only rose from the dead but actually had prophesied
that in advance (see
Destroy this Temple,
Bronze Snake,
A little while), then everything else He had said - including His declaration
of being God who came to die to save us from our sins and hell - had to be taken
seriously.
If Jesus hadn't proven His deity by His resurrection, Christianity would
never have made it past this crowd. See
Before Abraham was, I AM and
John 18.
Would Jesus' disciples have re-assembled without His
resurrection?
Consider things also from the perspective of Jesus' disciples. They had
followed Jesus around for three years and seen amazing miracles (see
Miracles of Jesus). Yet when Jesus was crucified, all but one of
them ran off and hid "for fear of the Jews"
(John 20:19, see
Peace be with you) coming for them as well. But here
they were just six weeks later, confidently declaring Jesus'
resurrection to a massive crowd of Jews who had called for Jesus to be
crucified and who could now arrest and have them crucified as well.
Something happened during those six weeks - something so dramatic in
fact, that it confirmed their faith in Jesus' deity and words more than
all of His miracles that they had witnessed during the previous three
years combined.
What could be more convincing than seeing Jesus make
the blind see, heal
the sick, feed thousands, calm storms, walk on
water, etc.?
This time, it wasn't what Jesus did, but what He couldn't do: He
couldn't quietly stay dead. During those six weeks, they had seen and talked
with the physically resurrected Jesus, who even ate in front of them
(see
Peace be with you) to prove that they weren't seeing a ghost.
How did His disciples spend the rest of their of
their lives?
Not seeking money or
comfort, but getting beaten up, chased out, even martyred for telling
people to repent from their sins and believe that Jesus rose from the dead to prove
that He is God who had died to pay the death penalty due for their sins.
Why would the disciples do that if it weren't true?
Most people don't choose a life of suffering for any cause. A rare
few choose a life of suffering for a cause that they believe to be true.
Nobody chooses a life of suffering, even unto martyrdom, for a cause that they know to be a lie.
What do the remainders of the disciples' lives
indicate about the resurrection of Jesus?
What does the resurrection of Jesus mean for the rest
of your life?